... | ... | @@ -30,8 +30,11 @@ We propose the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
- Which is which will be decided on a case-by-case basis. The main criterion is: is GHC a passive client of the library, which is maintained by someone else (e.g. Cabal, containers), or is the library intimately coupled with GHC's inner workings (e.g. template-haskell)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
> If in doubt we should resolve ties in favour of darcs; we can always change our minds later, but changing and then changing back would be silly.
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Our specific proposals for the master VCS for each boot library are:
|
|
|
|
... | ... | |