... | ... | @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ So we have decided to avoid the extensible record debate, but how can we have mu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All records solutions are planning on using the dot operator for normal record field selection. We need to consider the [future usage of the dot, particularly as a function composition operator](records/dot-operator).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(DORF doesn't insist on dot notation: it's to be syntactic sugar for reverse function application.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Comparisons
|
... | ... | |