Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Unverified Commit 5a191118 authored by Tom Smeding's avatar Tom Smeding Committed by GitHub
Browse files

Remove outdated footnote about module re-exports

The footnote is invalid with GHC 9.2.4 (and possibly earlier): the described behaviour in the main text works fine.
parent ec58093c
No related branches found
No related tags found
3 merge requests!38Make --no-tmp-comp-dir the default,!37Adapt to latest xhtml version, various optimizations,!31Support HsToken in DataDecl and ClassDecl
...@@ -591,14 +591,7 @@ However, if the modules are not *completely* re-exported, for example: ...@@ -591,14 +591,7 @@ However, if the modules are not *completely* re-exported, for example:
import C (a, b) import C (a, b)
then Haddock behaves as if the set of entities re-exported from ``B`` then Haddock behaves as if the set of entities re-exported from ``B``
and ``C`` had been listed explicitly in the export list [#notImplemented]_. and ``C`` had been listed explicitly in the export list.
.. Comment: was this ever implemented? Perhaps this part of the docs
should just be removed until it is implemented?
.. [#notImplemented] This is not implemented at the time of writing
(Haddock version 2.17.3 with GHC 8.0.2). At the moment, Haddock
always inserts a module cross-reference.
The exception to this rule is when the re-exported module is declared The exception to this rule is when the re-exported module is declared
with the ``hide`` attribute (see :ref:`module-attrs`), in which with the ``hide`` attribute (see :ref:`module-attrs`), in which
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment