I've removed it for now. If you make a release I can add it back.

Let me know if you want to make a release for the two backported commits or if the submodule bump should be dropped from the ghc-9.6 backports.

I wasn't in charge of backporting, I merely relayed the message to whoever was doing backports at the time.

@Kleidukos : @sheaf mentioned that he didn't do a backport and wasn't sure if everything needed to be backported....

The mystery deepens, as I see that @sheaf claims to have backported this MR already one year ago: !35 (comment 517513)

Ah perhaps I'm wrong and it's caused by something else....

@luite I'm not sure I understand why hi-haddock is relevant. To me it rather sounds like a concern regarding punning and exporting entities that we...

Reproduction video

Here's one instance where I'm seeing it: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/template-haskell-2.22.0.0/docs/Language-Haskell-TH-Syntax.html#t:PkgName...

@stephenjudkins I can't seem to reproduce this. Can you see it with current haddock or with something that was uploaded on Hackage like https://hac...