Make `check` recognise `TypeAbstractions`
See #9496. “Backport” of #9502, notice that we are not adding a new constructor, just tweaking `check` behaviour. This is improve UX without breaking changes.
Showing
- Cabal/src/Distribution/PackageDescription/Check.hs 4 additions, 3 deletionsCabal/src/Distribution/PackageDescription/Check.hs
- cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Check/ConfiguredPackage/Fields/KnownTypeAbstractions/cabal.out 2 additions, 0 deletions.../ConfiguredPackage/Fields/KnownTypeAbstractions/cabal.out
- cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Check/ConfiguredPackage/Fields/KnownTypeAbstractions/cabal.test.hs 5 additions, 0 deletions...figuredPackage/Fields/KnownTypeAbstractions/cabal.test.hs
- cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/Check/ConfiguredPackage/Fields/KnownTypeAbstractions/pkg.cabal 13 additions, 0 deletions.../ConfiguredPackage/Fields/KnownTypeAbstractions/pkg.cabal
- changelog.d/pr-9503 11 additions, 0 deletionschangelog.d/pr-9503
- editors/vim/syntax/cabal.vim 2 additions, 0 deletionseditors/vim/syntax/cabal.vim
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment