Defer freeing of mega block groups
Solves the quadratic worst case performance of freeing megablocks that was described in issue #19897. During GC runs, we now keep a secondary free list for megablocks that is neither sorted, nor coalesced. That way, free becomes an O(1) operation at the expense of not being able to reuse memory for larger allocations. At the end of a GC run, the secondary free list is sorted and then merged into the actual free list in a single pass. That way, our worst case performance is O(n log(n)) rather than O(n^2). We postulate that temporarily losing coalescense during a single GC run won't have any adverse effects in practice because: - We would need to release enough memory during the GC, and then after that (but within the same GC run) allocate a megablock group of more than one megablock. This seems unlikely, as large objects are not copied during GC, and so we shouldn't need such large allocations during a GC run. - Allocations of megablock groups of more than one megablock are rare. They only happen when a single heap object is large enough to require that amount of space. Any allocation areas that are supposed to hold more than one heap object cannot use megablock groups, because only the first megablock of a megablock group has valid `bdescr`s. Thus, heap object can only start in the first megablock of a group, not in later ones.
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment