-
Joachim Breitner authored
As #13479 shows, there are corner cases where the simplifier decides to not eta-expand a function as much as its call arity would suggest, but instead transforms the code that the call arity annotation becomes a lie. As the call arity information is only meant to be used by the immediatelly following simplifier run, it makes sense to simply zap the information there. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3390
e07211f7