Doc wibble

compiler/rename/RnNames.lhs

@@ -60,12 +60,14 @@ and packages. Doing this without caching any trust information would be very
 slow as we would need to touch all packages and interface files a module depends
 on. To avoid this we make use of the property that if a modules Safe Haskell
 mode changes, this triggers a recompilation from that module in the dependcy
-graph. So we can just worry mostly about direct imports. There is one trust
-property that can change for a package though without recompliation being
-triggered, package trust. So we must check that all packages a module
-tranitively depends on to be trusted are still trusted when we are compiling
-this module (as due to recompilation avoidance some modules below may not be
-considered trusted any more without recompilation being triggered).
+graph. So we can just worry mostly about direct imports.
+
+There is one trust property that can change for a package though without
+recompliation being triggered: package trust. So we must check that all
+packages a module tranitively depends on to be trusted are still trusted when
+we are compiling this module (as due to recompilation avoidance some modules
+below may not be considered trusted any more without recompilation being
+triggered).
 
 We handle this by augmenting the existing transitive list of packages a module M
 depends on with a bool for each package that says if it must be trusted when the
@@ -110,7 +112,7 @@ haskell at all and simply imports B, should A inherit all the the trust
 requirements from B? Should A now also require that a package p is trusted since
 B required it?
 
-We currently say no but I saying yes also makes sense. The difference is, if a
+We currently say no but saying yes also makes sense. The difference is, if a
 module M that doesn't use Safe Haskell imports a module N that does, should all
 the trusted package requirements be dropped since M didn't declare that it cares
 about Safe Haskell (so -XSafe is more strongly associated with the module doing