testsuite: Fix test output broken by efba0546

Looks right to me.

(cherry picked from commit 7d9812e8)

testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T10619.stderr

 
 T10619.hs:9:15: error:
-    • Couldn't match type ‘b -> b’ with ‘forall a. a -> a’
+    • Couldn't match type ‘forall a. a -> a’ with ‘b -> b’
       Expected type: (b -> b) -> b -> b
         Actual type: (forall a. a -> a) -> b -> b
     • In the expression:
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ T10619.hs:14:15: error:
         bar :: p -> (b -> b) -> b -> b (bound at T10619.hs:12:1)
 
 T10619.hs:16:13: error:
-    • Couldn't match type ‘b -> b’ with ‘forall a. a -> a’
+    • Couldn't match type ‘forall a. a -> a’ with ‘b -> b’
       Expected type: (b -> b) -> b -> b
         Actual type: (forall a. a -> a) -> b -> b
     • In the expression:

testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5691.stderr

 
-T5691.hs:15:24: error:
+T5691.hs:14:9: error:
     • Couldn't match type ‘p’ with ‘PrintRuleInterp’
       Expected type: PrintRuleInterp a
         Actual type: p a
-    • In the first argument of ‘printRule_’, namely ‘f’
-      In the second argument of ‘($)’, namely ‘printRule_ f’
-      In the expression: MkPRI $ printRule_ f
-    • Relevant bindings include f :: p a (bound at T5691.hs:14:9)
+    • When checking that the pattern signature: p a
+        fits the type of its context: PrintRuleInterp a
+      In the pattern: f :: p a
+      In an equation for ‘test’: test (f :: p a) = MkPRI $ printRule_ f
 
 T5691.hs:24:10: error:
     • No instance for (Alternative RecDecParser)