-
The doc says that the last statement of an ado-block can be one of `return E`, `return $ E`, `pure E` and `pure $ E`. But `return` is not accepted in a few cases such as: ```haskell -- The ado-block only has one statement x :: F () x = do return () -- The ado-block only has let-statements besides the `return` y :: F () y = do let a = True return () ``` These currently require `Monad` instances. This MR fixes it. Normally `return` is accepted as the last statement because it is stripped in constructing an `ApplicativeStmt`, but this cannot be done in the above cases, so instead we replace `return` by `pure`. A similar but different issue (when the ado-block contains `BindStmt` or `BodyStmt`, the second last statement cannot be `LetStmt`, even if the last statement uses `pure`) is fixed in !6786.
The doc says that the last statement of an ado-block can be one of `return E`, `return $ E`, `pure E` and `pure $ E`. But `return` is not accepted in a few cases such as: ```haskell -- The ado-block only has one statement x :: F () x = do return () -- The ado-block only has let-statements besides the `return` y :: F () y = do let a = True return () ``` These currently require `Monad` instances. This MR fixes it. Normally `return` is accepted as the last statement because it is stripped in constructing an `ApplicativeStmt`, but this cannot be done in the above cases, so instead we replace `return` by `pure`. A similar but different issue (when the ado-block contains `BindStmt` or `BodyStmt`, the second last statement cannot be `LetStmt`, even if the last statement uses `pure`) is fixed in !6786.
Loading