Ziyang Liu authored Apr 23, 2022 and Marge Bot committed May 06, 2022

The following is currently rejected:

```haskell
-- F is an Applicative but not a Monad
x :: F (Int, Int)
x = do
  a <- pure 0
  let b = 1
  pure (a, b)
```

This has bitten me multiple times. This MR contains a simple fix:
only allow a "let only" segment to be merged with the next (and not
the previous) segment. As a result, when the last one or more
statements before pure/return are `LetStmt`s, there will be one
more segment containing only those `LetStmt`s.

Note that if the `let` statement mentions a name bound previously, then
the program is still rejected, for example

```haskell
x = do
  a <- pure 0
  let b = a + 1
  pure (a, b)
```

or the example in #18559. To support this would require a more
complex approach, but this is IME much less common than the
previous case.