Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
GHC
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Model registry
Operate
Terraform modules
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Reinier Maas
GHC
Commits
4d075924
Commit
4d075924
authored
1 year ago
by
Josh Meredith
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
JS/userguide: add explanation of writing jsbits
parent
d5a8780d
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
docs/users_guide/javascript.rst
+278
-30
278 additions, 30 deletions
docs/users_guide/javascript.rst
with
278 additions
and
30 deletions
docs/users_guide/javascript.rst
+
278
−
30
View file @
4d075924
.. _ffi-javascript:
FFI and the JavaScript Backend
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
==============================
.. index::
single: FFI and the JavaScript Backend
...
...
@@ -22,8 +22,46 @@ look like:
foreign import javascript "((x,y) => { return x + y; })"
js_add :: Int -> Int -> Int
.. _`JavaScript FFI Types`:
JavaScript FFI Types
--------------------
Some types are able to be used directly in the type signatures of foreign
exports, without conversion to a ``JSVal``. We saw in the first example
that ``Int`` is one of these.
There are a number of supported types that can be passed directly in this
way, and they act as primitives within GHC's JavaScript RTS. This is in
comparison to data structures that are implemented in Haskell, such as
``String`` - being a list, this doesn't have a primitive JavaScript implementation,
and isn't equivalent to a JavaScript string.
The following types are supported in this way:
* ``Int``, including ``Int32`` and other sized numerical values.
* ``Int64``, and other 64 bit numbers are passed as two variables to the function,
where the first includes the sign and the higher bits
* ``Bool``
* ``Char``
* ``Any``
* ``ByteArray#``
* ``Double`` and ``Float``
* ``MVar#``, and other RTS objects
* Unboxed tuples (e.g. ``(# a, b #)``) can appear in the return type, and are
constructed in JavaScript using macros such as ``RETURN_UBX_TUP2(x, y)``.
As in the C FFI, types in the JavaScript FFI can't be type checked against the foreign code, so
the following example would compile successfully - despite `5` not being a valid JavaScript value
for the Haskell `Bool` type:
.. code-block:: haskell
foreign import javascript "((x) => { return 5; })"
type_error :: Bool -> Bool
JSVal
~~~~~
^^^^^
The JavaScript backend has a concept of an untyped 'plain' JavaScript
value, under the guise of the type ``JSVal``. Values having this type
...
...
@@ -46,36 +84,9 @@ It also contains functions for working with objects:
* ``isUndefined :: JSVal -> Bool`` - test for the JavaScript ``undefined``
* ``getProp :: JSVal -> String -> JSVal`` - object field access
JavaScript FFI Types
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some types are able to be used directly in the type signatures of foreign
exports, without conversion to a ``JSVal``. We saw in the first example
that ``Int`` is one of these.
The supported types are those with primitive JavaScript representations
that match the Haskell type. This means types such as the Haskell ``String``
type aren't supported directly, because they're lists - which don't have
a primitive JavaScript representation, and so are incompatible with each
other.
The following types are supported in this way:
* ``Int``
* ``Bool``
* ``Char``
As in the C FFI, types in the JavaScript FFI can't be type checked against the foreign code, so
the following example would compile successfully - despite `5` not being a valid JavaScript value
for the Haskell `Bool` type:
.. code-block:: haskell
foreign import javascript "((x) => { return 5; })"
type_error :: Bool -> Bool
JavaScript Callbacks
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The JavaScript execution model is based around callback functions, and
GHC's JavaScript backend implements these as a type in order to support
...
...
@@ -173,3 +184,240 @@ We have to make sure not to use ``releaseCallback`` on any functions that
are to be available in HTML, because we want these functions to be in
memory indefinitely.
Writing Replacement Implementations for Libraries with C FFI Functions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many libraries make use of C FFI functions to accomplish low-level or
performance sensitive operations - known as ``cbits`` and often kept in
a folder with this name. For such a library to support the JavaScript
backend, the ``cbits`` must have replacement implementations.
In principle, it is possible for the JavaScript backend to automatically
compile ``cbits`` using Emscripten, but this requires wrappers to convert
data between the JS backend's RTS data format, and the format expected by
Emscripten-compiled functions. Since C functions are often used where
performance is more critical, there's potential for the data conversions
to negate this purpose.
Instead, it is more effective for a library to provide an alternate
implementation for functions using the C FFI - either by providing direct
one-to-one replacement JavaScript functions, or by using C preprocessor
directives to replace C FFI imports with some combination of JS FFI imports
and pure-Haskell implementation.
Direct Implementation of C FFI Imports in JavaScript as ``jsbits``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
When the JavaScript backend generates code for a C FFI import, it will call
the function named in the import string, prepended by ``h$`` - so the imported
C function ``open`` will look for the JavaScript function ``h$open``. No verification
is done to ensure that these functions are actually implemented in the linked
JavaScript files, so there can be runtime errors when a missing JavaScript
function is called.
Based on this, implementing a C function in JavaScript is a matter of providing
a function of the correct shape (based on the C FFI import type signature) in
any of the linked JavaScript sources. External JavaScript sources are linked
by either providing them as an argument to GHC, or listing them in the ``js-sources``
field of the cabal file - in which case it would usually be inside a predicate to
detect the ``javascript`` architecture, such as:
.. code-block:: cabal
library
if arch(javascript)
js-sources:
jsbits/example.js
Note that ``js-sources`` requires Cabal 3.10 to be used with library targets, and
Cabal 3.12 to be used with executable targets.
The shape required of the JavaScript function will depend on the particular
C types used:
* primitives, such as ``CInt`` will map directly to a single JavaScript argument
using JavaScript primitives. In the case of ``CInt``, this will be a JavaScript
number. Note that in the case of return values, a JavaScript number will usually
need to be rounded or cast back to an integral value in cases where mathematical
operations are used
* pointer values, including ``CString``, are passed as an unboxed ``(ptr, offset)``
pair. For arguments, being unboxed will mean these are passed as two top-level
arguments to the function. For return values, unboxed values should be returned
from JavaScript functions by using a special C preprocessor macro,
``RETURN_UBX_TUP2(ptr, offset)``
* ``CString``, in addition to the above pointer handling, will need to be decoded
and encoded to convert them between character arrays and JavaScript strings.
* other RTS primitive types are discussed previously in `JavaScript FFI Types`_.
As an example, let's consider the implementation of ``getcwd``:
.. code-block:: haskell
-- unix:System.Posix.Directory
foreign import ccall unsafe "getcwd" c_getcwd :: Ptr CChar -> CSize -> IO (Ptr CChar)
.. code-block:: javascript
// libraries/base/jsbits/base.js
//#OPTIONS: CPP
function h$getcwd(buf, off, buf_size) {
try {
var cwd = h$encodeUtf8(process.cwd());
if (buf_size < cwd.len && buf_size !== 0) {
h$setErrno("ERANGE");
RETURN_UBX_TUP2(null, 0);
} else if (buf !== null) {
h$copyMutableByteArray(cwd, 0, buf, off, cwd.len);
RETURN_UBX_TUP2(buf, off);
} else if (buf_size === 0) {
RETURN_UBX_TUP2(cwd, 0);
} else {
var out = h$newByteArray(buf_size);
h$copyMutableByteArray(cwd, 0, out, off, cwd.len);
}
} catch (e) {
h$setErrno(e);
RETURN_UBX_TUP2(null, 0);
}
}
Here, the C function ``getcwd`` maps to the JavaScript function ``h$getcwd``, which
exists in a ``.js`` file within ``base``'s ``jsbits`` subdirectory. ``h$getcwd``
expects a ``CString`` (passed as the equivalent ``Ptr CChar``) and a
``CSize`` argument. This results in three arguments to the JavaScript function - two
for the string's pointer and offset, and one for the size, which will be passed as a
JavaScript number.
Next, the JavaScript ``h$getcwd`` function demonstrates several details:
* In the try clause, the ``cwd`` value is first accessed using a NodeJS-provided method.
This value is immediately encoded using ``h$encodeUtf8``, which is provided by the
JavaScript backend. This function will only return the pointer for the encoded value,
and the offset will always be 0
* Next, we select one of several cases - based on the specification of the C function
that we're trying to immitate
* In the first case where the given buffer size is too small, but not zero, the function
must set the ``ERANGE`` error code, which we do here with ``h$setErrno``, and return
``null``. As we saw in the function arguments, pointers are passed as a ``(ptr, offset)``
pair - meaning ``null`` is represented by returning the unboxed pair ``(null, 0)``
* In the second case where there is enough space in ``buf`` to successfully copy the
bytes, we do so using ``h$copyMutableByteArray`` - a function supplied by GHC's JavaScript
RTS
* In the third case where ``buf_size`` is 0, this indicates in the C function's specification
that we can allocate a new buffer of the appropriate size to return. We already have
this in the form of the previously encoded ``cwd``, so we can just return it, along
with the 0 offset
* In the last case where ``buf`` is null, and ``buf_size`` is large enough, we allocate a
new buffer, this time with ``buf_size`` bytes of space using ``h$newByteArray``, and
we again perform a mutable copy
* To use C preprocessor macros in linked JavaScript files, the file must open with the
``//#OPTIONS: CPP`` line, as is shown towards the start of this snippet
* If an error occurs, the catch clause will pass it to ``h$setErrno`` and return the
``(null, 0)`` pointer and offset pair - which is a behaviour expected by the C function
in the error case.
Writing JavaScript Functions to be NodeJS and Browser Aware
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the above example of implementing ``getcwd``, the function we use in the JavaScript
implementation is from NodeJS, and the behaviour doesn't make sense to implement in a
browser. Therefore, the actual implementation will include a C preprocessor condition
to check if we're compiling for the browser, in which case ``h$unsupported(-1)`` will
be called. There can be multiple non-browser JavaScript runtimes, so we'll also have
to check at runtime to make sure that NodeJS is in use.
.. code-block:: javascript
function h$getcwd(buf, off, buf_size) {
#ifndef GHCJS_BROWSER
if (h$isNode()) {
try {
var cwd = h$encodeUtf8(process.cwd());
if (buf_size < cwd.len && buf_size !== 0) {
h$setErrno("ERANGE");
return (null, 0);
} else if (buf !== null) {
h$copyMutableByteArray(cwd, 0, buf, off, cwd.len);
RETURN_UBX_TUP2(buf, off);
} else if (buf_size === 0) {
RETURN_UBX_TUP2(cwd, 0);
} else {
var out = h$newByteArray(buf_size);
h$copyMutableByteArray(cwd, 0, out, off, cwd.len);
}
} catch (e) {
h$setErrno(e);
RETURN_UBX_TUP2(null, 0);
}
} else
#endif
h$unsupported();
RETURN_UBX_TUP2(null, 0);
}
Replacing C FFI Imports with Pure Haskell and JavaScript
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Instead of providing a direct JavaScript implementation for each C FFI import, we can
instead use the C preprocessor to conditionally remove these C imports (and possibly
use sites as well). Then, some combination of JavaScript FFI imports and Haskell
implementation can be added instead. As in the direct implementation section, any
linked JavaScript files should usually be in a ``if arch(javascript)`` condition in
the cabal file.
As an example of a mixed Haskell and JavaScript implementation replacing a C
implementation, consider ``base:GHC.Clock``:
.. code-block:: haskell
#if defined(javascript_HOST_ARCH)
getMonotonicTimeNSec :: IO Word64
getMonotonicTimeNSec = do
w <- getMonotonicTimeMSec
return (floor w * 1000000)
foreign import javascript unsafe "performance.now"
getMonotonicTimeMSec :: IO Double
#else
foreign import ccall unsafe "getMonotonicNSec"
getMonotonicTimeNSec :: IO Word64
#endif
Here, the ``getMonotonicTimeNSec`` C FFI import is replaced by the JavaScript FFI
import ``getMonotonicTimeMSec``, which imports the standard JavaScript function
``performance.now``. However, because this JavaScript implementation
returns the time as a ``Double`` of floating point milliseconds, it must be wrapped
by a Haskell function to extract the integral value that's expected.
In this case, the choice of using a mixed Haskell and JavaScript replacement
implementation was caused by the limitation of clocks being system calls. In a lot
of cases, C functions are used for similar system-level functionality. In such
cases, it's recommended to import the required system functions from standard
JavaScript libraries (or from the runtime, as was required for ``getcwd``), and
use Haskell wrapper functions to convert the imported functions to the appropriate
format.
In other cases, C functions are used for performance. For these cases, pure-Haskell
implementations are the preferred first step for compatibility with the JavaScript
backend since it would be more future-proof against changes to the RTS data format.
Depending on the use case, compiler-optimised JS code might be hard to complete with
using hand-written JavaScript. Generally, the most likely performance gains from
hand-written JavaScript come from functions with data that stays as JavaScript
primitive types for a long time, especially strings. For this, ``JSVal`` allows
values to be passed between ``Haskell`` and ``JavaScript`` without a marshalling
penalty.
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment