Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 5ff7cc26 authored by Apoorv Ingle's avatar Apoorv Ingle
Browse files

Expand `do` blocks right before typechecking using the `HsExpansion` philosophy.

- Fixes #18324 #20020 #23147 #22788 #15598 #22086 #21206

- The change is detailed in
  - Note [Expanding HsDo with HsExpansion] in `GHC.Tc.Gen.Do`
  - Note [Doing HsExpansion in the Renamer vs Typechecker] in `GHC.Rename.Expr`
         expains the rational of doing expansions in type checker as opposed to in the renamer

- Adds new datatypes:
  - `GHC.Hs.Expr.XXExprGhcRn`: new datatype makes this expansion work easier
    1. Expansion bits for Expressions, Statements and Patterns in (`ExpandedThingRn`)
    2. `PopErrCtxt` a special GhcRn Phase only artifcat to pop the previous error message in the error context stack

  - `GHC.Basic.Origin` now tracks the reason for expansion in case of Generated
    This is useful for type checking cf. `GHC.Tc.Gen.Expr.tcExpr` case for `HsLam`

  - Kills `HsExpansion` and `HsExpanded` as we have inlined them in `XXExprGhcRn` and `XXExprGhcTc`

- Ensures warnings such as
  1. Pattern match checks
  2. Failable patterns
  3. non-() return in body statements are preserved

- Kill `HsMatchCtxt` in favor of `TcMatchAltChecker`

- Testcases:
  * T18324 T20020 T23147 T22788 T15598 T22086
  * T23147b (error message check),
  * DoubleMatch (match inside a match for pmc check)
  * pattern-fails (check pattern match with non-refutable pattern, eg. newtype)
  * Simple-rec (rec statements inside do statment)
  * T22788 (code snippet from #22788)
  * DoExpanion1 (Error messages for body statments)
  * DoExpansion2 (Error messages for bind statements)
  * DoExpansion3 (Error messages for let statements)

Also repoint haddock to the right submodule so that the test (haddockHypsrcTest) pass

Metric Increase 'compile_time/bytes allocated':
    T9020

The testcase is a pathalogical example of a `do`-block with many statements that do nothing.
Given that we are expanding the statements into function binds, we will have to bear
a (small) 2% cost upfront in the compiler to unroll the statements.
parent cdddeb0f
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Showing
with 1117 additions and 256 deletions
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment