Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Mar 01, 2024
    • Torsten Schmits's avatar
      Introduce ListTuplePuns extension · d91d00fc
      Torsten Schmits authored and Marge Bot's avatar Marge Bot committed
      This implements Proposal 0475, introducing the `ListTuplePuns` extension
      which is enabled by default.
      
      Disabling this extension makes it invalid to refer to list, tuple and
      sum type constructors by using built-in syntax like `[Int]`,
      `(Int, Int)`, `(# Int#, Int# #)` or `(# Int | Int #)`.
      Instead, this syntax exclusively denotes data constructors for use with
      `DataKinds`.
      The conventional way of referring to these data constructors by
      prefixing them with a single quote (`'(Int, Int)`) is now a parser
      error.
      
      Tuple declarations have been moved to `GHC.Tuple.Prim` and the `Solo`
      data constructor has been renamed to `MkSolo` (in a previous commit).
      Unboxed tuples and sums now have real source declarations in `GHC.Types`.
      Unit and solo types for tuples are now called `Unit`, `Unit#`, `Solo`
      and `Solo#`.
      Constraint tuples now have the unambiguous type constructors `CTuple<n>`
      as well as `CUnit` and `CSolo`, defined in `GHC.Classes` like before.
      
      A new parser construct has been added for the unboxed sum data
      constructor declarations.
      
      The type families `Tuple`, `Sum#` etc. that were intended to provide
      nicer syntax have been omitted from this change set due to inference
      problems, to be implemented at a later time.
      See the MR discussion for more info.
      
      Updates the submodule utils/haddock.
      Updates the cabal submodule due to new language extension.
      
          Metric Increase:
              haddock.base
      
          Metric Decrease:
              MultiLayerModulesTH_OneShot
              size_hello_artifact
      
      Proposal document: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0475-tuple-syntax.rst
      
      Merge request: !8820
      
      Tracking ticket: #21294
      d91d00fc
  2. Feb 28, 2024
    • Teo Camarasu's avatar
      rts: avoid checking bdescr of value outside of Haskell heap · 74b24a9b
      Teo Camarasu authored and Teo Camarasu's avatar Teo Camarasu committed
      In nonmovingTidyWeaks we want to check if the key of a weak pointer
      lives in the non-moving heap. We do this by checking the flags of the
      block the key lives in. But we need to be careful with values that live
      outside the Haskell heap, since they will lack a block descriptor and
      looking for one may lead to a segfault. In this case we should just
      accept that it isn't on the non-moving heap.
      
      Resolves #24492
      74b24a9b
  3. Feb 27, 2024
  4. Feb 25, 2024
  5. Feb 21, 2024
  6. Feb 17, 2024
  7. Feb 14, 2024
  8. Feb 13, 2024
  9. Feb 12, 2024
    • Teo Camarasu's avatar
      nonmoving: Add support for heap profiling · bedb4f0d
      Teo Camarasu authored and Marge Bot's avatar Marge Bot committed
      Add support for heap profiling while using the nonmoving collector.
      
      We greatly simply the implementation by disabling concurrent collection for
      GCs when heap profiling is enabled. This entails that the marked objects on
      the nonmoving heap are exactly the live objects.
      
      Note that we match the behaviour for live bytes accounting by taking the size
      of objects on the nonmoving heap to be that of the segment's block
      rather than the object itself.
      
      Resolves #22221
      bedb4f0d
    • Sylvain Henry's avatar
      JS: add support for linking C sources · aef587f6
      Sylvain Henry authored and Marge Bot's avatar Marge Bot committed
      Support linking C sources with JS output of the JavaScript backend.
      See the added documentation in the users guide.
      
      The implementation simply extends the JS linker to use the objects (.o)
      that were already produced by the emcc compiler and which were filtered
      out previously. I've also added some options to control the link with C
      functions (see the documentation about pragmas).
      
      With this change I've successfully compiled the direct-sqlite package
      which embeds the sqlite.c database code. Some wrappers are still
      required (see the documentation about wrappers) but everything generic
      enough to be reused for other libraries have been integrated into
      rts/js/mem.js.
      aef587f6
    • Sylvain Henry's avatar
      JS: handle stored null StablePtr · df9fd9f7
      Sylvain Henry authored and Marge Bot's avatar Marge Bot committed
      Some Haskell codes unsafely cast StablePtr into ptr to compare against
      NULL. E.g. in direct-sqlite:
      
        if castStablePtrToPtr aggStPtr /= nullPtr then
      
      where `aggStPtr` is read (`peek`) from zeroed memory initially.
      
      We fix this by giving these StablePtr the same representation as other
      null pointers. It's safe because StablePtr at offset 0 is unused (for
      this exact reason).
      df9fd9f7
  10. Feb 10, 2024
    • Matthew Pickering's avatar
      rts: eras profiling mode · b0293f78
      Matthew Pickering authored and Marge Bot's avatar Marge Bot committed
      The eras profiling mode is useful for tracking the life-time of
      closures. When a closure is written, the current era is recorded in the
      profiling header. This records the era in which the closure was created.
      
      * Enable with -he
      * User mode: Use functions ghc-experimental module GHC.Profiling.Eras to modify the era
      * Automatically: --automatic-era-increment, increases the user era on major
        collections
      * The first era is era 1
      * -he<era> can be used with other profiling modes to select a specific
        era
      
      If you just want to record the era but not to perform heap profiling you
      can use `-he --no-automatic-heap-samples`.
      
      https://well-typed.com/blog/2024/01/ghc-eras-profiling/
      
      Fixes #24332
      b0293f78
  11. Feb 08, 2024
    • Ben Gamari's avatar
      Move `base` to `ghc-internal` · 44f6557a
      Ben Gamari authored and Marge Bot's avatar Marge Bot committed
      Here we move a good deal of the implementation of `base` into a new
      package, `ghc-internal` such that it can be evolved independently
      from the user-visible interfaces of `base`.
      
      While we want to isolate implementation from interfaces, naturally, we
      would like to avoid turning `base` into a mere set of module re-exports.
      However, this is a non-trivial undertaking for a variety of reasons:
      
       * `base` contains numerous known-key and wired-in things, requiring
         corresponding changes in the compiler
      
       * `base` contains a significant amount of C code and corresponding
         autoconf logic, which is very fragile and difficult to break apart
      
       * `base` has numerous import cycles, which are currently dealt with via
         carefully balanced `hs-boot` files
      
       * We must not break existing users
      
      To accomplish this migration, I tried the following approaches:
      
      * [Split-GHC.Base]: Break apart the GHC.Base knot to allow incremental
        migration of modules into ghc-internal: this knot is simply too
        intertwined to be easily pulled apart, especially given the rather
        tricky import cycles that it contains)
      
      * [Move-Core]: Moving the "core" connected component of base (roughly
        150 modules) into ghc-internal. While the Haskell side of this seems
        tractable, the C dependencies are very subtle to break apart.
      
      * [Move-Incrementally]:
      
        1. Move all of base into ghc-internal
        2. Examine the module structure and begin moving obvious modules (e.g.
           leaves of the import graph) back into base
        3. Examine the modules remaining in ghc-internal, refactor as necessary
           to facilitate further moves
        4. Go to (2) iterate until the cost/benefit of further moves is
           insufficient to justify continuing
        5. Rename the modules moved into ghc-internal to ensure that they don't
           overlap with those in base
        6. For each module moved into ghc-internal, add a shim module to base
           with the declarations which should be exposed and any requisite
           Haddocks (thus guaranteeing that base will be insulated from changes
           in the export lists of modules in ghc-internal
      
      Here I am using the [Move-Incrementally] approach, which is empirically
      the least painful of the unpleasant options above
      
      Bumps haddock submodule.
      
      Metric Decrease:
          haddock.Cabal
          haddock.base
      Metric Increase:
          MultiComponentModulesRecomp
          T16875
          size_hello_artifact
      44f6557a
  12. Feb 01, 2024
Loading