The are various motivation points:
- I'm not aware anyone third party running Cabal tests (maybe nixpkgs?)
- No need to do gen-extra-source-files, as Cabal-tests is not distributed
- No multiple rebuilds of Cabal-QuickCheck, Cabal-tree-diff
- Slightly smaller Cabal sdist (which is quite big still)

Also change generator to generate only `= True` equations,
for licenseIsFsfLibre and licenseIsOsiApproved.

I.e. find out where we don't yet
used `Distribution.Client.Compat.Prelude`.

- If the module is small I added direct `Prelude` imports.
- Add Exception, deepseq stuff to Cabal Prelude
- Add Parsec, Pretty and Verbosity to Client Prelude
- use for, for_, traverse and traverse_ (removes need for Control.Monad)

Fix #6615

Also add validate-8.10.1 make rule

No "manual" string concatenation,
and the template arguments are typed.

Also split workflows into parts, helps with restarting.
https://github.community/t5/GitHub-Actions/re-run-jobs/m-p/30476#M440

- Disable cabal-install's haddock on CI
- Temporarily disable cabal check (`-main-is` in tests)
- Remove this is not a lib note
- Tell to run git update-index --assume-unchanged

    ... when changing to -dev or -monolithic configuration.

    Run --no-assume-unchanged unconditionally, when
    changing to the production build.
- Improve auto-gen note in cabal-install.cabal
- Try to build haddock (with GHC-8.4.3 only)

Distribution.SDPX.LicenseId and Distribution.SDPX.LicenceExceptionId are
generated.

- common stanzas can be include other common stanzas
- `import: name1, name2` to import multiple stanzas
- Parse common stanzas in the same pass with other sections.
- Common stanzas have to be defined before use.
- Also negative tests
- Terse documentation, let's improve it as questions are asked

- Edit gen-extra-source-files to include golden files
- Amend elif warning to mention cabal-version: 2.2
- In regression golden tests, include also warnings

Note: ATM the common stanzas are completely handled inside parser,
GenericPackageDescription doesn't know about them anymore.
That can be changed, but the the flattening of
GenericPackageDescription to PackageDescription may fail.
I don't want to do that refactor now.